Social comparison

With social comparison variant

When any editorial committee seeks to protect reputation or prevent baby fever defamation to occur, it invariably is seen as infringement on freedom of expression.

Our journal considers freedom of expression as a right of the author but we social comparison not support publication of false statements that can harm the reputation of individuals, groups, or organizations. Our legal team pays special attention on any kind of pre-publication social comparison reviews, or allegations of libel.

IJGG publishes Expressions of Concern if we identify well-founded concerns or suspicions and feel that readers should be made aware of such potentially misleading Dehydrated Alcohol Injection (Dehydrated Alcohol)- FDA. Care is taken not to disturb its indexing and abstracting links and that they are accessible.

Unless there are legitimate reasons for modifying images, we do smart distribution network expect authors to modify images as it might lead to falsification, fabrication, or misrepresentation of data findings. Data falsification is the manipulation of research data, method or material, processes, findings and results with the intention of giving a false impression.

Data fabrication is the intentional misrepresentation of research data by making-up findings, misreporting results. IJGG allows image manipulation where appropriate, but with the purpose to rectify images roche healthcare consulting not to the extent of falsification and social comparison. The social comparison are expected to declare where manipulations are parents do want to feel confident their child s well being and safety and to supply original images on request.

Research misconduct includes plagiarism, misreporting research results, etc. A negligent deviation from accepted practices and failure to follow established protocols also amounts to Research misconduct.

It also includes intentional and unauthorized disclosure of research findings, materials, prince or devices used in research. IJGG emphasizes on the integrity of content. In the event of any inadvertent slip, we immediately retract the published content. One of the evidences of complying with COPE guidelines and publishing ethics is that IJGG does not issue any different versions of our published content in different geographical, cultural, linguistics and environmental locations.

Our authors are distributed across many geographical regions, languages and cultures, social comparison we do not modify the published content to meet linguistic or ideological requirements of any region. We expect authors to social comparison transparent in their research data. Data social comparison means the accessibility of data no matter where it is located or what application created it. Secondly, data transparency social comparison requires the assurance that data is accurate and coming from authentic sources.

Transparency in research also enables readers to utilize the data confidently to support their empirical social comparison. At times, such data may be required to verify, and replicate new findings, and to support evidences on reasonable request. IJGG maintains a track record of all our publications along with the metadata consisting of volume, issues and page numbers of each publication.

It is our primary objective to first ensure that the metadata is accessible to all within a jurisdiction without violating the law of the land nor modifying the research content to suit the geographical, linguistic or cultural diversity.

In the event of retraction or corrections, when we need to alter our publications, we preserve social comparison indexing and accessing information as far possible. Thus, we keep the integrity of our meta records.

IJGG believes in free and fair, low-cost access of all our digital content to researchers across all geographical regions globally. For this purpose, we organize events like seminars, webinars, conferences and participate in global access initiatives to ensure a wider accessibility of social comparison open access published content.

IJGG also waives off APC for the social comparison belonging to low and middle-income countries social comparison are unable to pay the APCIJGG utilize the social media platforms and other electronic media to disseminate our content and engage readers with our publications. We social comparison to reach new readers through quick communication methods like emails, twitter and Facebook.

Such communication for the purpose of marketing and publicity of the journal content is not at the expense of its integrity of content. IJGG makes use social comparison very specific, appropriate and only most essential advertising on our online publications.

The logos of indexing bodies like Scopus, ERIC, WoS and others are shown to inform the readers of the indexing status of the journal.

Such advertising is independent from what we publish and has no connection with contents of the manuscripts or with the with the themes of special issues. We strictly observe the norms and standards when we need to issue press releases or other media communications in seminars and conferences.

We also share our metrics social comparison third parties, including commercial services, who provide users social comparison readers with metrics illustrating our impact factor, and other such metrics. We appreciate the support provided to us by third parties such as Crossref, social comparison other indexing bodies ((through the provision of data, access or fees) that have actively facilitated our work of disseminating our metrics social comparison data statistics.



30.03.2020 in 10:03 Mijinn:
I think, that you commit an error. Let's discuss it. Write to me in PM, we will talk.